The uncertainty layer
for trustworthy AI science

A multi-agent virtual lab that fits GP surrogates, quantifies uncertainty with coverage-audited intervals, and draws the line where a model stops being valid. Other tools ask did it reproduce? β€” SwarmLabs answers how confident, and where does it break?

52+
Experiment scenarios
69
Strain database
100%
GP convergence
44
Capability coverage

Core capabilities

Four pillars of the virtual acceleration lab

πŸ”¬

Physics-model prediction

Engines built on the Arrhenius equation and reaction kinetics β€” no random-number generation. Each is calibrated on 900k+ real validation data points at ~5% mean error.

πŸ€–

Multi-agent collaboration

Eight specialized Bee Agents share knowledge through a blackboard pattern, covering literature search, hypothesis generation, experiment design, analysis, and peer review.

πŸ“š

DOI traceability

Connected to Crossref / PubMed / arXiv. Every prediction traces back to its source paper β€” transparent and auditable.

⚑

Bayesian optimization

AI searches for optimal experiment parameters with physics-guided grid search and local refinement, converging to the global optimum within 100 iterations.

πŸ›‘οΈ

Math-backed verification

Not a rubric score or an audit trail. Every claim carries a computed number: coverage against nominal, or an explicit pass / controlled / reject boundary. 18 literature benchmarks β€” including the 7 in the red zone β€” are published, not filtered.

See every claim verified →
πŸ“„

Automated reports

Generates standard research reports from results and validation data, with abstract, methods, results, and data-availability statements.

Browse the V&V report library →

Why not just use a general-purpose AI?

What SwarmLabs delivers that Claude, ChatGPT and other general AIs cannot

πŸ›‘οΈ

V&V credibility checks

Built on ASME V&V 10-2019(R2025) and Sandia's 16 SciML recommendations. Every prediction is scored on fidelity / simplicity / stability / coverage. General AIs cannot offer a physics audit.

🎨

WebGPU visualization

Browser-side molecular-orbital rendering of 10^6 grid points in ~100 ms, benchmarked against MOrbVis (ACS Omega 2026). Zero install, pure web.

πŸ’‘

Explainable AI

SHAP-style parameter attribution with a physical rationale for every recommendation. Explainable Bayesian optimization (XBO) shows *why*, not just *what*.

πŸ”’

Data ownership & compliance

You own your data; we never train on it. Transparent pricing at a fraction of enterprise lab platforms.

πŸ”¬

Domain-engine depth

143 specialized engines across chemistry, energy, materials, biology, separation, analytics, pharma, and electrochemistry β€” each calibrated on published data. General AIs cannot match domain depth.

πŸ“Š

Proprietary data moat

900k+ validation data points form an experiment parameter–result knowledge graph. Physics from real experiments, not statistical guesses from web text.

The 7-step research loop

From literature to report β€” the full research workflow in one place

1
πŸ“–

Literature

Real academic search via Crossref

2
πŸ’‘

Hypotheses

AI generates hypotheses from literature

3
πŸ“

Design

Pick engine & parameters

4
βš—οΈ

Virtual run

Run the physics-model prediction

5
πŸ“Š

Analysis

Uncertainty & confidence assessment

6
πŸ”

Peer review

Eight automated review checks

7
πŸ“„

Report

Standard-format research report

Proof, not promises

Every published claim on this site was re-run through the SwarmLabs virtual-experiment engine. 18 literature benchmarks, 7 in the OOD red zone β€” all published, none filtered. Try the live OOD guard yourself.

Start your virtual experiment

A demo account is ready β€” experience the full loop from literature to report.

πŸš€ Enter the lab